![]() There was wide variability in the measurement properties and quality of the studies. After excluding duplicates and screening on title and abstract, 82 studies were included with 75 self-reported measurement tools. The systematic search resulted in 2423 hits. ![]() Data of validity and/or reliability measurements was extracted from included studies and a meta-analysis using random effects was performed to assess the pooled correlation coefficients of the validity. Inclusion criteria were: 1) assessment of SB, 2) evaluation of subjective measurement tools, 3) being performed in healthy adults, 4) manuscript written in English, and 5) paper was peer-reviewed. ![]() ![]() The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and SPORTDiscus were searched up to March 2020. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to: 1) identify subjective methods to assess overall, domain- and behaviour-specific SB, and 2) examine the validity and reliability of these methods. However, little is known about comparative validity and reliability. questionnaires and diaries/logs) are widely implemented, and can be useful for capturing type and context of SBs. Subjective measures of sedentary behaviour (SB) (i.e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |